rap1 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)
Structured Review
![( A ) Experimental procedure for mice subjected to CRS. D, day. ( B and C ) Representative activity tracking and statistical analysis of time in the center and total distance traveled during OFT ( n = 12 to 13 mice per group). ( D and E ) Representative activity tracking and statistical analysis of time in open arms and open arm entries during EPMT. Same sample size as in (C). ( F ) Scheme for the analysis of total <t>Rap1</t> and active Rap1. ( G ) Representative Western blots from the Con and CRS mice. ( H ) Quantification analysis of relative total Rap1 and active Rap1 expression ( n = 5 per group). ( I ) Scheme for delivering vehicle or GGTI-298 into the dHPC and vHPC. ( J ) Representative images of cannula implantation in dHPC and vHPC. ( K and L ) Representative activity tracking and statistical analysis of time in the center and total distance traveled during OFT of mice after administering vehicle and GGTI-298 in dHPC ( n = 8 to 10 mice per group). ( M and N ) Representative activity tracking and statistical analysis of time in open arms and open arm entries during EPMT. Same sample size as in (L). ( O to R ) Same as in [(K) to (N)] except that the data were from mice receiving vehicle and GGTI-298 in vHPC ( n = 9 to 11 mice per group). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01. Two-way ANOVA [(L), (N), (P), and (R)]; Mann-Whitney U test [(C), left]; two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test [(C) right, (E), and (H)].](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_1498/pmc12101498/pmc12101498__sciadv.adt3163-f1.jpg)
Rap1 Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rap1 antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Enhanced Rap1 small GTPase activity in the ventral hippocampus drives stress-induced anxiety"
Article Title: Enhanced Rap1 small GTPase activity in the ventral hippocampus drives stress-induced anxiety
Journal: Science Advances
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adt3163
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Experimental procedure for mice subjected to CRS. D, day. ( B and C ) Representative activity tracking and statistical analysis of time in the center and total distance traveled during OFT ( n = 12 to 13 mice per group). ( D and E ) Representative activity tracking and statistical analysis of time in open arms and open arm entries during EPMT. Same sample size as in (C). ( F ) Scheme for the analysis of total Rap1 and active Rap1. ( G ) Representative Western blots from the Con and CRS mice. ( H ) Quantification analysis of relative total Rap1 and active Rap1 expression ( n = 5 per group). ( I ) Scheme for delivering vehicle or GGTI-298 into the dHPC and vHPC. ( J ) Representative images of cannula implantation in dHPC and vHPC. ( K and L ) Representative activity tracking and statistical analysis of time in the center and total distance traveled during OFT of mice after administering vehicle and GGTI-298 in dHPC ( n = 8 to 10 mice per group). ( M and N ) Representative activity tracking and statistical analysis of time in open arms and open arm entries during EPMT. Same sample size as in (L). ( O to R ) Same as in [(K) to (N)] except that the data were from mice receiving vehicle and GGTI-298 in vHPC ( n = 9 to 11 mice per group). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01. Two-way ANOVA [(L), (N), (P), and (R)]; Mann-Whitney U test [(C), left]; two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test [(C) right, (E), and (H)].
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Western Blot, Expressing, MANN-WHITNEY, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic of AAV injection to express Cre recombinase (Cre-eGFP) or eGFP alone (eGFP) under the CaMKII α promoter in the vHPC of Rap1 flx/flx mice followed by CRS and behavioral tests. ( B ) Representative images showing eGFP expression in vHPC. Scale bar, 500 μm. ( C ) Representative images of CaMKIIα immunostaining in the vCA1. Scale bar, 10 μm. ( D and E ) Representative activity tracking and quantification of time in the center and total distance traveled during OFT ( n = 14 to 15 mice per group). ( F and G ) Representative activity tracking and quantification of time in open arms and open arm entries during EPMT. Same sample size as in [(D) and (E)]. ( H ) Schematic of overexpressing Rap1-DN-mCherry or mCherry alone in the vHPC PNs followed by CRS and behavioral tests. ( I ) Representative images showing mCherry expression in vHPC. Scale bar, 500 μm. ( J ) Representative immunoblots for active Rap1 and total Rap1 and statistical analysis of the immunoblotting assay from the mCherry and Rap1-DN-mCherry mice ( n = 5 per group). ( K to N ) Same as in [(D) to (G)] except that the data were from mice infected with mCherry or Rap1-DN-mCherry ( n = 12 to 15 mice per group). ( O ) Schematic of overexpressing Rap1-CA-mCherry or mCherry alone in the vHPC PNs and subsequent behavioral tests. ( P and Q ) Same as in [(I) and (J)] except that the data were from mice infected with mCherry or Rap1-CA-mCherry ( n = 5 per group). ( R to U ) Same as in [(D) to (G)] except that the data were from mice infected with mCherry or Rap1-CA-mCherry and without subjecting to CRS ( n = 13 to 14 mice per group). Pooled data are presented as the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001. Mann-Whitney U test [(E) left, (N) left, and (S) right]; two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test [(E) right, (F), (J), (L), (N) right, (Q), (S) left, and (U)].
Techniques Used: Injection, Expressing, Immunostaining, Activity Assay, Western Blot, Infection, MANN-WHITNEY, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Schematics of AAV injections and subsequent CRS and electrophysiological experiments. ( B ) Representative firing traces of vCA1 PNs in response to 200- and 250-pA depolarizing current injections. ( C ) Statistical analysis of AP numbers evoked by different depolarizing current injections ( n = 18 to 19 neurons from five mice per group). ( D ) Representative fAHP traces. ( E ) Statistical analysis of fAHPs. Same sample size as in (C). ( F ) Representative traces showing transient A-type K + currents obtained at various voltages in vCA1 PNs. ( G ) Statistical analysis of transient A-type K + current densities recorded at +40 mV ( n = 12 to 13 neurons from six mice per group). ( H ) Representative blots of the total Kv4.2, Kv4.2 Thr 602 , Kv4.2 Thr 607 , and Kv4.2 Ser 616 in mCherry + CRS and Rap1-DN-mCherry + CRS mice. Statistical analysis of total Kv4.2 ( I ), Kv4.2 Thr 607 ( J ), Kv4.2 Ser 616 ( K ), and Kv4.2 Thr 602 ( L ) expressions in (H) ( n = 3 mice in each group). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures (B); two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test [(E), (G), and (I) to (L)].
Techniques Used: Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Experimental design for overexpressing Kv4.2-T607A (Kv4.2-T607A) or 3×FLAG alone (vehicle) in CRS mice and subsequent behavioral tests. ( B ) Representative blots and comparisons of the Kv4.2 Thr 607 expression from vehicle and Kv4.2-T607A mice ( n = 3 mice per group). ( C ) Representative traces showing transient A-type K + currents obtained at various voltages in vCA1 PNs and comparisons of transient A-type K + current densities recorded at +40 mV ( n = 7 to 8 neurons from three mice per group). ( D ) Representative activity tracking in OFT. ( E ) Statistical analysis of time in the center and total distance traveled during OFT ( n = 13 to 15 mice per group). ( F ) Representative activity tracking in EPMT. ( G ) Statistical analysis of time in open arms and open arm entries during EPMT. Same sample size as in (E). ( H ) Representative firing traces of vCA1 PNs in response to depolarizing current injection. ( I ) Statistical analysis of AP numbers evoked by different depolarizing current injections in (H) ( n = 15 to 19 neurons from four to five mice per group). ( J ) Representative fAHP traces. ( K ) Statistical analysis of fAHPs in (J). Same sample size as in (I). ( L ) Schematic depicting the virus injection strategy for inhibiting phosphorylation of Kv4.2 at Thr 607 in Rap1-CA mice and subsequent behavioral tests. ( M to T ) Same as in [(D) to (K)] except that the data were from vehicle + Rap1-CA and Kv4.2-T607A + Rap1-CA mice [(M) to (P), n = 10 to 14 mice per group; (Q) to (T), n = 13 to 15 neurons from four mice per group]. Data are presented as the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001. Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures [(I) and (R)]; Mann-Whitney U test [(N) left, and (P) left]; two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test [(B), (C), (E), (G), (K), (N) right, (P) right, and (T)].
Techniques Used: Expressing, Activity Assay, Injection, Virus, Phospho-proteomics, MANN-WHITNEY, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: Chronic stress triggers prolonged Rap1 activation in vHPC PNs, facilitating the phosphorylation of Kv4.2 at Thr 607 and diminishing its channel activity. Consequently, when exposed to external anxiogenic environmental cues, the responsiveness of these neurons is heightened, leading to an anxiogenic effect.
Techniques Used: Activation Assay, Phospho-proteomics, Activity Assay

